Discovering Drazen Petrovic

March 27, 2013

I’m going to do something that is almost unheard of among sports fans. I’m going to confess a lack of knowledge about an athlete whose career apex occurred while I was watching the sport. Sure, I know about Petrovic’s contribution to the game and about his relationship with his former Yugoslavian teammates before and after the country was torn apart by, civil war, but I’m largely ignorant to his game.

In the pre-League Pass early-90s, the Nets weren’t exactly a network television fixture. If you weren’t a Nets season ticket holder, your opportunities to see Petrovic play were probably limited to one or two nationally televised games and a handful of Nets/Bulls matchups on WGN. The only things the average American hoops fan could tell you about Petrovic’s game, is that he was the best of the early NBA euros; which is to say that  he was a great shooter and terrible defender who probably liked to smoke cigarettes at halftime. That’s why these youtube compilations are such a revelation. In the words of a good friend, “Petrovic is a total showman and a jackass”.

Notice the sheer number of under-the-leg passes. WHO DOES THAT? It’s a sort of anachronistic vaudevillian showboating that owes more to the Harlem Globetrotters than any actual brand of contemporary American basketball…more Meadowlark Lemon than Hot Sauce.  Halfway through watching the first video, one of the stranger moments of my life began to make sense.

It was the summer of 1994, at an outdoor court near Amsterdam’s Rijksmuseum. The details of the afternoon are somewhat fuzzy, but somehow, I found myself playing pick-up ball on a court that appeared to be roughly the size of a football field. Granted, it was many years ago, and I may or may not have been in the midst of a coffee shop crawl that afternoon, but I distinctly remember court being abnormally long. I’m also fairly certain that it wasn’t fenced in. I suspect that two basketball hoops had simply been placed at opposite ends of a concrete slab with no intention that the intervening space would ever serve as a court. Nonetheless, run’ we did.

As remarkable as the court itself, was the style of play. It was an uptempo style that featured a lot of penetrate-and-pitch, with very little low-post play. This may sound unremarkable now, as this style of basketball dominates playgrounds and open gyms nationwide, but this style of play was much less common.  And then there was the showboating. It was practically Maravichian in nature. Lots of between-the-legs passes, and drives to the lane that featured players wrapping the balls around their bodies before attempting the layup. It was jarring enough for me to go home and proudly proclaim to anyone who would listen that European’s only exposure to American basketball was highlight videos and globetrotters tours. It’s obvious now, having watched these videos, that they weren’t trying to imitate American basketball at all. They were paying homage to one of the greatest European players who ever lived.


The forgotten superstar everyone remembers

March 7, 2013

The athlete who hung around too long is a familiar trope. Unable to say goodbye to the game because they can’t admit that they no longer have what it takes, or too frightened of what life after sports holds to let go, so they linger. And then there’s the athlete who didn’t get to play long enough to reach his full potential. These are the heart-breakers, the what-ifs. Sports lore is littered with the tales of these bests-that-never-were.

In recent years another model of careers ending at the wrong time has emerged; the player deemed so toxic that he finds himself involuntarily retired despite retaining the ability to contribute at the professional level. They are the Barry Bonds, Terrell Owens, Allen Iversons and Sean Averys of the world. Whether plagued by scandal, psychologically unstable, unwilling to accept a smaller role, or just plain jerks, they’ve found themselves on the outside looking in. Unique among this group, however, is the NBA’s forgotten superstar; a man who has to personify persona non grata, so unwelcome in professional basketball circles, that he’s actually beginning to fade from our collective consciousness. Stephon Marbury.

Ask most NBA fans to name the 25 greatest PGs of all time, and you’re likely to get consensus on about 10. Some lists will suffer from recency bias, ranking players whose legacies are very much works-in-progress over those with established legacies of greatness. Others still, will veer towards the historical, spurred by tall tales of legends past and citing defensive rule changes as evidence that modern stars have inflated stats. What most of these hypothetical lists will have in common is the omission of Stephon Marbury.

This is the part where you say to yourself that Marbury ISN’T a top-25 pg. Maybe you’re right. He is, however, good enough to be in the discussion. Marbury is one of only six players to average at least 20 points and 8 assists for eight or more seasons. The other names on that list: Oscar Robertson, Nate “Tiny” Archibald, Magic Johnson, Isiah Thomas, Tim Hardaway. That’s a five-time all-star and four men included on the NBA’s 50 Greatest Player of All-Time list. Why then, have we forgotten how good Marbury was?

There are a few factors in play here. First and foremost, he didn’t win. In the post-Jordan NBA, we have come to expect nothing less than championships from our stars. There is this belief that a great player, through sheer force of wil,l can drag a roster full of rotation players and cast-offs to the promised land, and if not, he’s a loser. People point to the fact that every team he left during his prime, got better in the following season. They somehow forget that in two of those cases he was replaced by Jason Kidd and Steve Nash, and in the third, a young power forward named Kevin Garnett who was just entering his prime and blossomed in the season following Marbury’s departure.

Although Marbury was briefly among the best players in the game, being good enough to be named to Team USA, his peak coincided with a dark period in the NBA (they took the bronze). For the five minutes between Jordan and Lebron eras Marbury was held up alongside Allen Iverson as an example of everything that was wrong with the NBA. It was a league filled with tattooed, me-first prima donnas who had to be wrestled into submission by the strong arm of benevolent commissioner David Stern…except for that part where that entire narrative isn’t true. Marbury was just one of many stars born into the the hip-hop generation painted as thugs and punks by the aging, culturally out of touch (and maybe just a little bit racist) sports media and the league’s megalomaniacal, paternalistic dictator of a commissioner.

Another thing Marbury has going against him is recency bias. It may seem odd that recency bias would negatively affect the perception of a player as contemporary as Stephon Marbury, but it’s true. We all saw Stephon Marbury suck RECENTLY. We remember his struggling, scandal plagued Knicks. We remember him being released, unable to find a team only to land on the Celtics’ bench, only to be released after only 23 games. Truth be told, while Marbury was past his prime, he still had enough left in the tank to contribute at a high level, but teams are unwilling to tolerate Marbury’s special brand of erratic behavior from anything less than an all-star caliber player. Simply put, he assholed his way out of the NBA. Fans find it extremely difficult to attribute greatness to players who find themselves saddled with the label of team cancer. Also:

These factors, combined with Marbury’s decision to continue his career in China while his peers are either revered elder statesmen of the league, or retired on their own terms create the perfect recipe for a tarnished and eventually forgotten legacy.


Advanced Statistics or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Hero Ball

May 9, 2012

In recent years, basketball has seen a rise in advanced statistics rivaling the sabermetrics movement in baseball. The traditional basketball statitistics; points, rebounds, assists etc. are flawed because they lack perspective. Good numbers on a bad team has practically become a cliché in basketball, but that was impossible to quantify without watching the games. The box-score won’t tell you that Ricky Davis secured the tenth rebound of his triple-double by shooting and intentionally missing at his own basket.

Seeking a higher understanding of player value teams have embraced statistics as simple as plus/minus (the difference points scored by and against the player’s team while said player was on the court) and as complicated as Player Efficiency Rating (PER):

uPER = (1 / MP) * [ 3P + (2/3) * AST + (2 - factor * (team_AST / team_FG)) * FG + (FT *0.5 * (1 + (1 - (team_AST / team_FG)) + (2/3) * (team_AST / team_FG))) - VOP * TOV - VOP * DRB% * (FGA - FG) - VOP * 0.44 * (0.44 + (0.56 * DRB%)) * (FTA - FT) + VOP * (1 - DRB%) * (TRB - ORB) + VOP * DRB% * ORB + VOP * STL + VOP * DRB% * BLK - PF * ((lg_FT / lg_PF) - 0.44 * (lg_FTA / lg_PF) * VOP) ])

where: factor = (2 / 3) – (0.5 * (lg_AST / lg_FG)) / (2 * (lg_FG / lg_FT))
VOP = lg_PTS / (lg_FGA – lg_ORB + lg_TOV + 0.44 * lg_FTA)
DRB% = (lg_TRB – lg_ORB) / lg_TRB

And that’s before you adjust it for pace.  Got it? These are called advanced statistics for a reason. They’re a great tool for teams assessing player value…if you’re a scout, GM or otherwise involved in an NBA front office. They are, to borrow a phrase, inside baseball. For years, advanced basketball metrics were the exclusive domain of insiders and stat-geeks, until 2009’s famed “No Stats All Star” piece in the NY Times Magazine. The article details how Houston Rockets GM Daryl Morey used advanced metrics to build a team of low-cost players who, while unimpressive when measured by traditional statistics, actually provide great value on the court. Since the publication of “No Stats”, basketball writers and fans have become increasingly enamored with these new-look stats.

Despite the greater depth of understanding of player performance, advanced metrics do absolutely nothing to increase a fan’s enjoyment of the game. For those of us whose livelihood is not directly tied to the performance of NBA teams, basketball is a diversion. It’s entertainment, and must come to terms with the fact that the best-played basketball, as determined by statistical analysis, isn’t necessarily the most thrilling or aesthetically pleasing.

Most recently the concept of “hero ball” has come under fire. Hero ball is the notion that the best players should put their teams on their backs and will them to victory late in the game…that the superstar should take the game-winning shot. Statistically, speaking, a team should do what works best for them throughout the game. Hero ball leads to poor shot selection and wasted possessions (possessions are the currency of advanced basketball references). From a strategic perspective these people are probably right. I say probably, because human beings are not rational actors, and statistics fail to quantify things like the motivation factor of a thunderous dunk or dagger three.


Can Kentucky Beat The Bobcats?

March 30, 2012

In recent weeks, more than a few basketball pundits have inquired as to whether or not the University of Kentucky Wildcats can beat the worst NBA teams.  No less of an NBA expert that Charles Barkley has gone on record as saying that the Wildcats could actually beat the struggling Charlotte Bobcats, to which I say; FOH, son.

The Wildcats boast the most talented team in the nation with two All-Americans (and sure-fire lottery picks), and a total of 4 players who could potentially taken in the first round of the NBA draft. They also have a few players who will go on to play in China and Poland, or become teachers, accounts and car salesmen.

Now lets look at the Charlotte Bobcats.

DJ Augustin: was 1st Team All American at Texas

Bismack Biyombo: Biyombo did not play a minute of college basketball, but when he faced off against Kentucky’s Anthony Davis in last year’s Nike Hoops Summit, he put forth a dominating performance, scoring 12 points shooting 5-for-7 from the field with 11 rebounds and 10 blocks.

Derrick Brown: Is not very impressive

Matt Carrol: was 1st Team All Big East and honorable mention All-American at Notre Dame

DeSagana Diop: didn’t play in college, but was a McDonalds All-American

Gerald Henderson: 1st Team All-ACC and 2nd Team All-American at Duke

Cory Higgins: His Father is President of Basketball Operations for the Bobcats.  No, really.

Corey Maggette: I expected Maggette’s Duke resume to have a few honorifics, but the best he could muster was ACC All Rookie Team.  I think we can all agree that he’s a better player than 99.999999% of players that Kentucky has faced.

Byron Mullens: probably couldn’t make the UK squad

Eduardo Najera: was 3rd Team All American at Oklahoma

Tyrus Thomas: not a lot of high marks on his resume, but was the Atlanta Region MVP in the 2006 NCAA tournament.

Kemba Walker: 1st Team All American ad UConn

DJ White: Big 10 Player of the Year and 2nd team All-American at Indiana

Reggie Williams: Lead the nation in scoring TWICE during his time at VMI.

Do you see how ridiculously stacked the worst NBA team is? To the best of my knowledge, every one of the Bobcats’ losses this season has come at the hands of an NBA team. Can we please end all of the hacky arguments about college teams beating professionals?


League Pass Bonanza

February 29, 2012

From now through Sunday, March 4th, NBA League Pass is offering a free trial. This is an excellent opportunity to check out some interesting teams that don’t get a lot of national shine.

 

Games of Note:

-Wednesday

Min at LAL- Ricky Rubio is the flashiest slightly-above-average point guard since a young Jason “White Chocolate” Williams, but his teammate, Kevin Love is one of the 10-15 best players in the game.

CLE at NYK- Linsanity is on the wane, not that teams have figured him out, but this is a great opportunity to see probable Rookie of the Year, Kyrie Irving in action.  Irving was last seen tanking the skills competition and ruining some poor ball-boy’s chance at a $25,000 scholarship.

-Thursday

LAC at SAC- Congrats to Mayor Kevin Johnson,and the people of Sacramento for securing a stadium deal to keep the Kings in town. Condolences to the 15 NBA players who have to live in Sacramento.

-Friday

MIA at UTA- The Jazz are a surprisingly fun team to watch, and Gordon Haywood is an absolute stud. I can’t say I had high expectations for him coming out of Butler, but I actually don’t know very much about basketball.

DEN at HOU- There’s a reason Knicks fans didn’t want to lose Gallinari. He won’t be in action Friday, but you should watch anyway. Chances are you haven’t seen the Nuggets play since half of their team left for China.  They’re pretty good.

-Saturday

IND at NO- PaulGeorgePaulGeorgePaulGeorgePaulGeorgePaulGeorgePaulGeorgePaulGeorgePaulGeorge

CLE at WAS- Epic Vale needs to be seen to be believed. If you enjoy the unintentional comedy if Tyrus Thomas, you’re going to love JaVale McGee

Sunday

All the best games are nationally televised. If you absolutely must watch a League Pass game, check out Warriors/Raptors. Curry and Ellis are the best untelevised 1-2 punch.


Linsanity and Coded Speech

February 9, 2012

In the last few days, New York Knicks point guard Jeremy Lin has become the talk of the NBA, and rightfully so. Thrust into the starting line-up by a rash of injuries (and general shittiness) at the PG spot, Lin has led the struggling Knickerbockers to three straight wins, largely without superstars Carmelo Anthony and Amare Stoudemire. In those three victories Lin has averaged a staggering 25 points, 8.3 assists and 3.7 rebounds, and walked off the court to chants on MVP.  The Giants may have won the Super Bowl, but Lin is the toast of the town.

Lin’s road to the NBA has been well documented by now. After leading his team to the California State Championship and being named Player of The Year, and failing to receive a SINGLE Division 1 scholarship offer, Lin opted to attend Harvard. As a member of the Crimson, Lin distinguished himself as one of the best collegiate players in the nation, torching perennial D-1 powerhouse UConn to the tune of 30 points and 9 boards and being named a candidate for the John Wooden Award.  Despite showing himself to be an NBA level talent in various pre-draft tournaments and camps, Lin went undrafted.

I don’t think it takes much of a leap of logic to posit that Lin’s ethnicity may have factored into various college and NBA programs’ decision to pass on a player with Lin’s resume and skill set. They weren’t used to seeing quality guard production from Asian or Asian-American players. If people like Lin aren’t good, then Lin wasn’t good. In one of the world’s most competitive fields, Lin was saddled with the additional baggage of being the first of his kind. It’s a lot easier to walk a trail than blaze one.

What makes Lin’s success difficult to comprehend is the way he plays the game. As point guards go, he’s relatively weak in the fundamentals department. He isn’t the best jump-shooter and his ball-handling leaves a lot to be desired.  He succeeds largely through fearlessness, aggression and an explosive first step. He isn’t a court visionary and at this stage of his career, he’s a questionable decision maker. In Monday’s victory over the Utah Jazz, Lin had eight turnovers to go along with his eight assists. 

That combination of attributes typically gets a player saddled with the dreaded “low basketball IQ” tag. The tacit implication of low basketball IQ, is the player isn’t that bright in general. Serious journalists never intimate as much, but one need only to read a couple of blogs or listen to sports talk radio to hear the undertones brought to the fore.  In the world of sports, at least, no one is willing to question the intelligence of a Harvard grad. Looking back, I can’t recall and player of Asian descent’s basketball IQ being questioned despite the relative bone-headedness of players like Sun Ming Ming and Sun Yue.

This isn’t a cry for members of the media to spread the hate evenly. Rather, it’s the hope that Lin’s ascent puts an end to the conflation between on-court decision-making and intelligence. The term basketball IQ is too baggage-laden to be meaningful. Yes, there are multiple types of intelligence, but court savvy is as much a product of  vision, composure, coordination and repetition as is analytical ability.  Lin’s relative lack of court savvy proves that athletic players aren’t necessarily less heady than their lead-footed counterparts.


NBA Player Logos

January 24, 2012

Inspired by Derrick Rose’s new D-Rose (get it?) logo, we at stylepoints asked our design department (which also happens to be our editorial and business departments) to create logos for some of our other favoritye NBA players.  Let us know that you think.

 

 

 

 

 


NBA Players at the Rucker

August 4, 2011

Earlier this week, Kevin Durant made a major splash in the basketball media by scoring 66 points in an Entertainers Basketball Classic game at New York’s famed Rucker park.  This is big news primarily because basketball writers have nothing else to write about now.  The EBC, or The Rucker as it’s commonly called is not new to hosting NBA talent.  NBA luminaries from Wilt Chamberlain and Earl “the Pearl” Monroe to Allen Iverson and Kevin Garnett have made the pilgrimage to Harlem to test themselves against the best that the world of streetball has to offer.

We at StylePoints would like to present some of our favorite NBA player at the Rucker videos.  I couldn’t find that elusive clip of Earl Manigault pinning Lew Alcindor and Jim Carroll’s shots to the backboard in succession, so you’re going to have to settle for modern era players.

Kobe Bryant

Eagle Colorado, and the Shaq feud irrevocably changed the way we look at Kobe Bryant, but early on he was David Stern’s dream ambassador for the post-Jordan NBA.  He was handsome, articulate and worldly…the bi-lingual Continental scion of former pro Jelly Bean Bryant. While Kobe was an easy sell to Middle-America, his reception was a little icier in the country’s urban centers.  In short, Kobe had zero street-cred.  This was his most successful attempt at garnering a little love from the streets.

Baron Davis

With the image of a bloated, unmotivated Davis using the regular season to play himself into shape in L.A. and Cleveland the past couple years, it’s easy to lose sight of the fact that Baron Davis possessed all of the tools to be a perennial all-star.  Here’s a little reminder of just how explosive B-Diddy used to be,

 

Steve Francis

Much like Davis, Stevie Franchise is a what-could-have been player.  Unlike Davis, Francis is largely forgotten when it comes to discussions of squandered talent.  In their youth, they were very similar players, athletic do-it-all points with the capacity to lead their teams in points rebounds and assists.  Francis also possessed one of the sickest handles the league has seen.  His handles and hops made him the NBA player most suited for Rucker Park.

 

Vince Carter

I didn’t want to include this for two reasons: a) because of rain, the game was played in Gauchos Gym instead of Rucker Park, and b) his man was giving him the business, but the dunk at the end was just sick to omit.

 

BONUS VIDEO:  A ton of NBAers at the Park

 


T.R.O.Y.

March 14, 2011

On some level most adult sports fans understand that they don’t love sports as much as they did in their youth.  The rationale doesn’t vary that much from fan to fan.  Your priorities changed.  Your job or family rightfully took precedence.  It seems silly to idolize players younger than you.  You see athletes as people and don’t like what you see.  Adults can’t allow something as trivial as sport to affect them emotionally.  These are the easy excuses.

The truth is, some of us had out hearts broken…had our belief systems shaken to the core.  We walked away hardened, jaded.  We convince ourselves that time and experience are transformative.  For the most part, we’re right, but every now and then, something comes along to remind us that our innocence never truly died.  That idealistic kid didn’t disappear.  He was sublimated.  Wounds that we thought were healed were merely forgotten.

Those five kids were my first heartbreak.  It wasn’t about basketball.  Chris, Jalen, Juwan, Jimmy and Ray represented me, or at least who I thought I was.  My belief in them bordered on faith, and seeing them fail against a lesser foe had the emotional impact of losing a first love.  In fact, It may have been more impactful.  I learned to love again, and do so with far more passion than in my younger days, but I will never be able to invest so much of myself in a team again.


Congratulations, New York

February 22, 2011

You just gutted the young core of your team, gave away a massive expiring contract, a first round draft pick and two seconds.  Danilo Gallinari is still playing on his rookie contract and  beginning to put it all together.  I think it’s fair to say that his ceiling is somewhere between Andrea-Bargnani-with-heart and poor-man’s-Dirk-Nowitzki. And now, he’s gone.  Raymond Felton was a cost-effective point guard of the future.  Wilson Chandler may have been your second best all-around player and one of the few Knicks to play any defense.  Anthony Randolph is a 21-year-old head-case with 30ppg scoring ability.  Twenty one years old, but sure, just give up on him.  All this to get Carmelo Anthony and Chauncey Billups.

Realistically, the Knicks could have picked Melo up as a free-agent in the off-season.  They had the core and the cap-space, and Melo had the right to veto any trade he didn’t like.  Furthermore, even if the Nuggets traded him to another team, Melo’s contract would still be up at the end of this season.  Only Denver and Carmelo benefited from this trade.  Denver knew Anthony was leaving as a free-agent, so getting anything in exchange is a boon.  Melo can get more money by re-signing with his current team than he could get as a free-agent, and he will surely re-up with the Knicks now.  Instead, the Knicks mortgaged the farm to get the ultimate prize: a slightly doughy scoring machine, who may just be the evolutionary Alex English…a guy who fills up one column of the box score as well as anyone else in the league but that’s about it.  And then there’s Billups, a 34-year-old point guard who in the last two seasons has failed to average more than 5.5 assists or 3 rebounds on an offensive minded team that gets a LOT of possessions.

Maybe they know something I don’t.  Perhaps Billups plans on retiring, and they are going to use the added cap space for  CP3 or something.  I just don’t see how these Knicks are going to compete with the Bostons, Miamis, Orlandos or Chicagos of the East.  Granted, the team will definitely be fun to watch, but it just doesn’t seem to be built for playoff success.  Of course, the last time I made a post lamenting a NYK personnel move, it ended up re-igniting the team and making the Knicks relevant on a national scale for the first time in a decade (the move, that is, not the post).  We’ll see.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.