Balling Out of Control: Edward Green Golf Shoes

February 23, 2012

 

 

 

 

This is amost certainly not a thing.


The Problem With Style Blogs

February 15, 2012

I’ve been thinking about style blogs, and their place in the blogosphere and the media at large. My feeling is that, while they provide a pleasant diversion, with a few exceptions the level of objectivity to be meaningful. Style is of course subjective, but can be approached from a place of objectivity. There will always be sartorial ideologues, but provided that they are unbeholden to the industry, their voices add value to the community. The problem lies in the fact that so many style bloggers are either employed in or aspire to work in the fashion industry.

 This fosters a culture of transparent shilling and naked sycophancy. Truthfully, it’s probably unwise to be publically critical of a potential employer, client or networking connection, but it’s that conceit that stifles the discourse. For better or worse, blogging occupies a luminal space just outside the realm or, but within the orbit of  journalism. A certain level of honesty is implied, and distance from the subject is required in order for it to be meaningful.  

I’m not implying that a blog shouldn’t be a tool for career advancement. As evidenced by my infrequent posting activity, blogging is work, and good work should be rewarded. The conflict of interest lies in the type of work for which the blogger is positioning himself. Most music bloggers are auditioning for the part of music writer, not tour DJ. Sports bloggers dream of becoming columnists or beat writers. They  aren’t exactly angling for that last roster spot or front-office gig.  As a newish parent, I’ve read my share of mommy blogs, and I’m pretty damned sure that none of those women has or intends tofile for legal custody of my daughter.  Style bloggers, on the other hand, dream of being buyers, stylists, publicists and virtually every other position in the fashion industry. Shit, a few of them are actually manufacturing and selling clothes. That isn’t exactly the sort of climate in which divergent views tend to flourish.


Linsanity and Coded Speech

February 9, 2012

In the last few days, New York Knicks point guard Jeremy Lin has become the talk of the NBA, and rightfully so. Thrust into the starting line-up by a rash of injuries (and general shittiness) at the PG spot, Lin has led the struggling Knickerbockers to three straight wins, largely without superstars Carmelo Anthony and Amare Stoudemire. In those three victories Lin has averaged a staggering 25 points, 8.3 assists and 3.7 rebounds, and walked off the court to chants on MVP.  The Giants may have won the Super Bowl, but Lin is the toast of the town.

Lin’s road to the NBA has been well documented by now. After leading his team to the California State Championship and being named Player of The Year, and failing to receive a SINGLE Division 1 scholarship offer, Lin opted to attend Harvard. As a member of the Crimson, Lin distinguished himself as one of the best collegiate players in the nation, torching perennial D-1 powerhouse UConn to the tune of 30 points and 9 boards and being named a candidate for the John Wooden Award.  Despite showing himself to be an NBA level talent in various pre-draft tournaments and camps, Lin went undrafted.

I don’t think it takes much of a leap of logic to posit that Lin’s ethnicity may have factored into various college and NBA programs’ decision to pass on a player with Lin’s resume and skill set. They weren’t used to seeing quality guard production from Asian or Asian-American players. If people like Lin aren’t good, then Lin wasn’t good. In one of the world’s most competitive fields, Lin was saddled with the additional baggage of being the first of his kind. It’s a lot easier to walk a trail than blaze one.

What makes Lin’s success difficult to comprehend is the way he plays the game. As point guards go, he’s relatively weak in the fundamentals department. He isn’t the best jump-shooter and his ball-handling leaves a lot to be desired.  He succeeds largely through fearlessness, aggression and an explosive first step. He isn’t a court visionary and at this stage of his career, he’s a questionable decision maker. In Monday’s victory over the Utah Jazz, Lin had eight turnovers to go along with his eight assists. 

That combination of attributes typically gets a player saddled with the dreaded “low basketball IQ” tag. The tacit implication of low basketball IQ, is the player isn’t that bright in general. Serious journalists never intimate as much, but one need only to read a couple of blogs or listen to sports talk radio to hear the undertones brought to the fore.  In the world of sports, at least, no one is willing to question the intelligence of a Harvard grad. Looking back, I can’t recall and player of Asian descent’s basketball IQ being questioned despite the relative bone-headedness of players like Sun Ming Ming and Sun Yue.

This isn’t a cry for members of the media to spread the hate evenly. Rather, it’s the hope that Lin’s ascent puts an end to the conflation between on-court decision-making and intelligence. The term basketball IQ is too baggage-laden to be meaningful. Yes, there are multiple types of intelligence, but court savvy is as much a product of  vision, composure, coordination and repetition as is analytical ability.  Lin’s relative lack of court savvy proves that athletic players aren’t necessarily less heady than their lead-footed counterparts.


Superbol Live Blog

February 5, 2012

Welcome to our inaugural Superbol live blog. Understand that this constitutes dissemination without express written consent of the National Football League.  That’s how we roll here.

We’ve live-blogged other events in the past, but this is different; we’re actually watching this. Things you should know:

We= Me

I’m hosting an ersatz Superbol party.

I’m drinking.  I’ve been drinking.  I will continue to drink.

There’s a 72% chance that the Bacon Explosion is going to do me in before halftime.

7:03 EST:

End of the first quarter.  So, I kinda forgot about this. Vegas made a fortune on first score bets. NOBODY had safety.

7:05 EST:

My wife yells that she needs help putting the baby to bed. I miss the next eight minutes of play.

7:16:

Pats secondary = what I just dropped in the diaper genie.

7:18

Chris Collinsworth describes playing in the Superbol as “unsettling”

7:20

I expect David Beckham Bodywear to be extremely popular with the 2(x)ist crowd.

7:23

Ochocinco checks into the game. There is zero chance the ball is going his way.

7:25

They were whining about the ‘splosion. “That’s so gross” or “it’s a heart attack on a bun”. They’re all going back for seconds.

9:22 am, Monday

My hosting and boozing duties got in the way of my live blog, so let’s recap a few major points:

-Ochocinco caught a ball which pretty much ensures that we’ll have to deal with him as a cultural phenomenon for another couple years.  I miss Chad Johnson.

-That Madonna shit was an embarrasment to everyone involved

-The song that Madge performed with MIA and Nicki Minaj is pure K-pop. You will never convince me that it wasn’t written for Girls Generation.

-Allowing the Giants to score the go-ahead touchdown was brilliant, and oddly more reminiscent of what a good Madden player does than what most NFL coaches would do.

-Bostonians will tell you that the Pats haven’t hoisted the Lombardy trophy since Brady left a pregnant Bridget Moynahan for Gisele. I’d like to remind them that they have zero championships since THEY GOT CAUGHT CHEATING.

-African children psyched to get their Patriots Super Bowl championship t-shirts next week.


Interwebs Genius Uses Wunderground and Baskeball Reference to Pinpoint Cube’s “Good Day”

January 27, 2012

Link

 

Which Day Was A Good Day For Ice Cube?

CLUE 1:
“went to short dogs house,
they was watching Yo MTV
RAPS”
Yo MTV RAPS first aired:
Aug 6th 1988

CLUE 2:
Ice Cubes single “today was a good day” released on:
Feb 23 1993

CLUE 3:
”The Lakers beat the Super
Sonics”
Dates between Yo MTV Raps air date AUGUST 6 1988 and the release of the single FEBRUARY 23 1993 where the Lakers beat the Super Sonics:

Nov 11 1988 114-103
Nov 30 1988 110-106
Apr 4 1989 115-97
Apr 23 1989 121-117
Jan 17 1990 100-90
Feb 28 1990 112-107
Mar 25 1990 116-94
Apr 17 1990 102-101
Jan 18 1991 105-96
Mar 24 1991 113-96
Apr 21 1991 103-100
Jan 20 1992 116-110

CLUE 4:
Dates of those Laker wins over SuperSonics where it was a clear day with no Smog:

Nov 30 1988
Apr 4 1989
Jan 18 1991
Jan 20 1992

CLUE 5:
“Got a beep from Kim, and
she can fuck all night”
beepers weren’t adopted by mobile phone companies until the 1990s. Dates left where mobile beepers were availible to public:
Jan 18 1991
Jan 20 1992

CLUE 6:
Ice Cube starred in the film “Boyz in the hood” that released late Summer of 1991, but was being filmed mid-late 1990 early 1991 and Ice Cube was busy on set filming the movie Jan 18 1991 too busy to be lounging around the streets with no plans. Ladies and Gentlemen.

The ONLY day where:
Yo MTV Raps was on air
It was a clear and smogless day
Beepers were commercially sold
Lakers beat the SuperSonics
and Ice Cube had no events to attend was…

JANUARY 20 1992

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWfbGGZE07M

 


NBA Player Logos

January 24, 2012

Inspired by Derrick Rose’s new D-Rose (get it?) logo, we at stylepoints asked our design department (which also happens to be our editorial and business departments) to create logos for some of our other favoritye NBA players.  Let us know that you think.

 

 

 

 

 


Racial Politics in Boxing

January 19, 2012

One of the best and worst things about boxing is that it’s one of the few sports where race and nationality really, really matter. It colors the way we view fighters. If I describe a boxer as “slick”, what do you picture? How about “warrior”. It’s only natural that something as primal as two men punching each other in the face is going to tap into other, more base parts of the human psyche.  We are tribal by nature, and while that part of our personality is easily sublimated by the open-minded and compassionate amongst us, it always lurks. I’m not ashamed to admit, that when watching two fighters with whom I have no previous knowledge, I’m likely to root for the one who looks most like me (read, ruggedly handsome).

No one knows this better than boxing promoters. Styles make fights, but they don’t always sell fights. Right now, Floyd Mayweather Jr is looking for an opponent to face in Las Vegas on May 5th.  The date is crucial. He’s already reserved the MGM grand for the date and he also happens to be going to jail in June. He has stated on numerous occasions that he hopes to fight Manny Pacquiao. And, why wouldn’t he? It’s the richest purse in the sport, the fight everyone wants to see and Pacquiao is coming off of a disappointing showing against Juan Manuel Marquez.

Unfortunately, Top Rank promoter, Bob Arum says that Manny can’t possibly fight until June, when a new outdoor arena can be built in Las Vegas. Anyone with even a passing interest in boxing knows that Pacquiao and Mayweather have been dancing around each other for the last two years. Both parties and their fans have accused the other of ducking the fight. This notion is absurd. Neither fighter is afraid of the other.  It’s far more complex than that.

Both fighters know that their drawing power will be diminish after their mega-fight, so it’s in their best interest to pad their pockets (and records) in the interim). Floyd Mayweather controls every financial aspect of his fights, something that Bob Arum is highly unlikely to allow. There’s the control issue, and the fact that Arum and Mayweather hate one another, and neither has any interest in making the other any wealthier. Since “negotiations” began for Pac/May,  Floyd Mayweather Jr has not faced a single fighter promoted by Top Rank. Many Pacquiao has faced only one fighter not promoted by Top Rank. Expect that trend to continue until they face each other.

What does any of this have to do with race or nationality? Right now, the only money fights that either fighter can make is lucrative, only because of nationality. Mayweather was quick to lock down the first Saturday in May. For gambling purposes, it’s second in importance to only Super Bowl Sunday.  Kentucky Derby in the Morning. Prize fight at night.  This year, it just happens to fall on Cinco De Mayo. Expect Floyd to face off against a popular but faded, unproven or undersized Mexican champion. My bet is on Saul “Canelo” Alvarez, whose popularity stems, in part, from the fact that he doesn’t look like a Mexican fighter. Mexicans and Mexican Americans remain one of the most rabid fan-bases in the sport, and Mayweather/Alvarez would be guaranteed to do numbers.

That leaves Pacquiao without an opponent. I’m going to go out on a limb and predict the exact date, opponent and venue for Pacquiao: June 9th, Miguel Cotto at Yankee Stadium. On the heels of his revenge-match with Antonio Margarito, the Top Rank promoted Cotto is once again a hot property in the boxing world. Serious fight fans realize that Cotto has zero chance of defeating Pacquiao, but that is of little import. Bob Arum knows that he can fill Yankee stadium with throngs of flag waving Nuyoricans is he puts Cotto in the ring with Manny on the weekend of the Puerto Rican Day parade.

I’m of the belief that we’ll get out Mayweather/Pacquiao fight, but only after the two parties have milked every other payday they can find out of the boxing public. Fortunately for them, as long as race and nationality matter they can make lucrative fights that have nothing to do with the competitive nature of the matches.


Thawed Tundra

January 16, 2012

Last night’s Giants win at Lambeau Field illustrates Green Bay’s diminishing home field advantage.  In past seasons convventionable wisdom about playing in Green Bay was simple: you do not brave the frozen tundra of Lambeau and emerge victorious. Few stadiums in the world (Azteca, Mile High) offered more advantage conditions for the home team.

Truthfully, most home field advantages are psychological.  Professional athletes, or people period, for that matter are creatures of habit. Travelling disrupts normal routines. They’re sleeping in unfamiliar environs, and eating in unfamiliar places. Crowds are actually rooting against them. These elements take visiting players out of their mental comfort zones, and offer a slight edge to the home team.  Physically quantifiable home-field advantages are less common, and usually come in the form of extreme climate or high altitude, but what happens when the climate changes?

I want to make it clear, that I am not using anecdotal evidence to support global warming.  Global warming is a fact, but can not be evidenced by an unseasonably warm January afternoon nor can it be disproven by October snowfall. Global warming is long-term, big-picture stuff like rising seas and shrinking polar ice caps.  I’m writing about a warming trend.  In the last few years, The NFL seasons have gotten warmer.

I hues you could say that last night’s Packers/Giants game was played in the cold. The mercury did dip down to 30, but that’s hardly the storied frozen tundra of yore.  In fact, New England’s drubbing of Tim Tebow and the Broncos in Saturday’s divisional playoff game was the first game played anywhere this entire season in sub-30 degree weather. The temperature for that game? 24 degrees. Not a single game this season was played with the temperature in the teens. Not in Chicago, not in Green Bay, not in Buffalo.

Looking back at this past season and the two seasons prior, the NFL has seen ZERO games played in single-digit temperatures. Last season (regular and playoffs) saw thirteen games with temperatures in the 20s and three in the teens. The 2009 had only six games with twenty-something temps and three games in the teams. Maybe my vision has been warped by watching two NFL Films productions, but I seem to remember places like Lambeau, Soldier and Heinz fields being positively inhospitable come December. I recall closeup shots the center snapping the ball off of actually frozen turf, with steam rising off of his bare hand. I remember players huddled under blankets while sitting on warming benches. Now we have players going bare armed in playoff games in Baltimore.

I think it may be time to reassess how much of a home field advantage Lambeau provides the Packers.  Unlike the elevation in Denver or the insane acoustics in Seattle, there is no quantifiable advantage of playing in Green Bay as compared to any other football city.


Update on Modern Tailor

January 12, 2012

Since my last Modern Tailor entry, I have purchased four more shirts, and I have learned the following:

- The “common” collar lining is pretty damned stiff. While the site will not allow you to add removable collar stays to their softest collar, you can request them in the comments, and MT will happily oblige.

-If the description of the cloth doesn’t include the weight, thread count or indicate that it’s 2-ply, you can probably assume it’s going to feel like paper. (note: I only have experience with their pure cotton shirtings)

-It is possible to get blue oxford cloth as a returning customer. Simply order the shirt using any $39.95 fabric, and submit. Then email customer service and tell them you’d like to change your fabric to Blue oxford. They should reply that they are willing to accomodate your request, but as a returning customer, you are ineligible for the introductory rate.

-It’s in my personal best interest if you order using this link.

 

 


New Year’s Resolution

January 2, 2012

I’m not going to let this thing die. Expect at least one meaningful update per week.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.